Hello Santiago, On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 11:29 +0000, Santiago Vila wrote: > Now it does not FTBFS anymore, which is good. >
Great. > But the packaging is still not ok: After "dpkg-buildpackage -A" I see > the following packages created: > > kpartx_0.5.0+git1.656f8865-5_amd64.deb > kpartx-udeb_0.5.0+git1.656f8865-5_amd64.udeb > multipath-tools_0.5.0+git1.656f8865-5_amd64.deb > multipath-tools-boot_0.5.0+git1.656f8865-5_all.deb > multipath-tools-dbg_0.5.0+git1.656f8865-5_amd64.deb > multipath-udeb_0.5.0+git1.656f8865-5_amd64.udeb > > It should only create "multipath-tools-boot". > > Hint: You should probably add option '-a' to every dh_* call in > binary-arch and option '-i' to every dh_* call in binary-indep. > Ah ha... I wondered how to do that. But didn't bother much because a full build, when triggered, will run both the targets. But this is good to know. > > > However, if you have time and motivation, I would really consider > switching to "dh". A debian/rules using "dh" is usually a lot more > readable and "nicer". I definitely want to move to the new build setup, but it is the lack of time which has held me. Maybe I'll just do it once and for all (move to new dh). Lets keep the bug open. Whichever build setup we choose, this bug will be closed back once the build is fixed. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
