On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:47:23 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2016-03-15 22:25, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:12:18 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > > Aurelien, I would suggest to have libusb-dev (libusb 0.1) > > > > package in Debian repository, because it is stable and is > > > > working, not like new libusb-1.0-0-dev which is slow and > > > > unusable. > > > > > > I disagree with this statement, libusb 1.0 is used in many > > > applications without any problem. Contrary to libusb 0.1, it is a > > > maintained library, so if you encountered any bug that makes it > > > slow, unusable or whatever, please report a bug and a testcase, I > > > am sure we'll find a solution. > > > > 3 days ago I sent email to libusb-de...@lists.sourceforge.net ML, > > now waiting for reply. So hope that this problem of slow device > > listing will be fixed... If you want I can CC you next. > > I don't see your mail on the mailing list, it seems it hasn't > arrived. Did you got any bounce message?
I got "Your message to libusb-devel awaits moderator approval". -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
