Hi, On jeu., 2016-03-17 at 10:20 +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > It seems linux-grsec will remain i386 and amd64 only.
There's no reason to, actually. It's just that right now I don't have a way to test on other architectures, so I prefer keeping it that way. But if someone steps to to maintain it I'm all open. > But more > important that's not suitable for a stable release. Filed by its > maintainer, Yves-Alexis. Well, uploading new Linux major version to stable looks indeed not trivial, (thus my filing of #810506), but ultimately it's the RT's call. > The patch itself can be updated more easily > with point releases and users may compile and test their updated > kernels before using it. For me this gives more trust in the package, > even if it needs more attention from time to time. Well, I'm not sure how much sense that make. Do you intend to ship in stable a patch completely unrelated to the current kernel and just follow the test kernel and ship it pristine? > > > I can certainly let you request the removal, or will handle it myself at > > one point, unless you really want to keep it and have it updated. > Sure, I've failed big to keep it up-to-date. But I would like to keep > this fresh in the archive. Hope upstream will release testing kernels > every now and then. I'm not sure what you mean here. -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
