So, looks like the LAVA team does need adb & fastboot on all ARM platforms, right? :)
I was wrong about android-libunwind. Actually I remember it was android-libbacktrace, which is needed by adb, who FTBFS in the other platforms. What if android-libbacktrace still FTBFS on ARM? In that case, adb won't be built either, and I fear this will even further prevent our packages from migrating to testing. Actually, this bug #817823 is already pulling it from migrating. _hc, did you remember libbacktrace FTBFS on ARM or MIPS? Do you think it's OK to build adb/fastboot and their dependencies on ARM and/or MIPS?
