Hi Rene,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Rene Engelhard <r...@debian.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 07:38:58AM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
>> Boost 1.58 -> successfully compiled LibreOffice 5.1.2~RC1.
>
> Including the tests?
It seems the tests are OK. I got hundreds of lines like:
-- cut --
[SLC] unoxml
[SLC] writerfilter
[SLC] writerperfect
[PKG] instsetoo_native_setup
[CUS] postprocess/images
[CHK] odk
[CUT] services
[CHK] sal
[BIN] instsetoo_native
[BIN] postprocess
[CHK] dbaccess
[GAL] arrows
[GAL] computers
-- cut --
But I don't know the color codes and abbreviation meaning. The only
errors I get:
-- cut --
[CUT] sc_condformats
No protocol specified
W: Unknown node under /registry/extlang: deprecated
W: Unknown node under /registry/grandfathered: comments
W: Unknown node under /registry/grandfathered: comments
No protocol specified
unknown:0:Test::testFdo77229
An uncaught exception of type com.sun.star.uno.RuntimeException
- PresenterCanvas: invalid number of arguments
##Failure Location unknown## : Error
Test name: Test::testFdo77229
An uncaught exception of type com.sun.star.uno.RuntimeException
- PresenterCanvas: invalid number of arguments
Failures !!!
Run: 1 Failure total: 1 Failures: 0 Errors: 1
Error: a unit test failed, please do one of:
make CppunitTest_cppcanvas_emfplus CPPUNITTRACE="gdb --args"
# for interactive debugging on Linux
make CppunitTest_cppcanvas_emfplus VALGRIND=memcheck
# for memory checking
make CppunitTest_cppcanvas_emfplus DEBUGCPPUNIT=TRUE
# for exception catching
[builddir]/libreoffice-5.1.2~rc1/solenv/gbuild/CppunitTest.mk:90:
recipe for target
'[builddir]/libreoffice-5.1.2~rc1/workdir/CppunitTest/cppcanvas_emfplus.test'
failed
make[1]: ***
[[builddir]/libreoffice-5.1.2~rc1/workdir/CppunitTest/cppcanvas_emfplus.test]
Error 1
[CUT] sc_new_cond_format_api
-- cut --
It _seems_ test suite problems like 'no protocol specified', 'invalid
number of arguments' and not failures of the tests itself. But if you
know more, please share it with me.
As Boost C++ library 1.60 is in NEW[1], do you have experience with
it? I think it would be better to wait until it's accepted and re-run
my tests with ICU 57.1 version. What do you think?
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/boost1.60_1.60.0%2Bdfsg-1.html
