Hi Matthia, I think that 810709 and 803275 are quite distinct problems:
* 803275 is on failures on several non-amd64 architectures * 810709 is a general FTBFS due to a changed Cython/3.5 Also, 803411 still blocks 803275, since the problem mentioned there caused the FTBFS on s390 (although this is hidden in the moment by the general FTBFS). I think it does not help to solve these problems if they are merged together -- IMO it is important to see that it is not enough to get it compiling in amd64. Could you explain why you did these changes? Best regards Ole