Hi, On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, Osamu Aoki wrote: > While browsing the "Contents" section, I wonder why "Devuan" is listed > at 9th even before other significant derivative such as "Raspbian" at > 12th position. [...] > "devuan" is not even listed on distrowatch and it is only a bogus web > site. I think this entry should be removed with next minor updates, > since "devuan" looks like nothing but scam to get donation for me.
I don't think the order means much... at least not further than the very first derivatives. That said the addition of Devuan was made by Roland Mas so I'll let him decide whether it should stay or not. I'm not a huge fan of that project and it seems to not have delivered much. But we have put explanations about our interrogation in the text so it's not a problem either to keep it for now... > Also "trisquel" which FSF endorsed is missing. (Not that > I liked some points to Debian raised by trisquel people on non-free > mentioned in the documentation etc. *1, they are at least valid fork.) > "skolinux" "steamOS" ... these epoch making distributions with > government and corporate backings are also missing. [...] > *1) https://bugs.debian.org/686481 (incomplete state) I don't think we want to list all derivatives. Mainly those of generic interest... SteamOS can be interesting but I'm not sure about Trisquel and Skolinux. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/
