On Sunday, 17 April 2016 5:25:55 PM AEST Sergei Golovan wrote: > Well, I guess you understand that removing the susceptible files from > the yaws package will not fix the bug you reported.
One have to begin somwhere...
> So, if you're not really interested in fixing this just tell me,
I'll file those bugs, it'll just take time...
> and I'll just close it.
This is not the option. DFSG compliance is not optional. You really have a
choice between moving package to non-free or removing non-free files.
Situation is quite straightforward so I don't see why would you wait for
feedback from other maintainers before fixing the problem.
Though it would be interesting to get their feedback. :)
> > I'm quite sceptical about this as I don't see many options here as
> > I doubt we would be able to find compromise between DFSG and non-free
> > licensing terms...
>
> Maybe, maybe not. The authors' intention is what matters.
Than I suggest you to consider reporting the problem upstream. :)
--
All the best,
Dmitry Smirnov.
---
What is the truth, but a lie agreed upon.
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
