Hi

>I have no opinion about section. So change it to optional?


I think you should
>Because this package contains just text files, needed to build reverse
>hash table with file names for old mpq archives. There is no need to
>depend on something.


ok
>But package smpq depends on this package. It uses stormlib read those
>files and send content to smpq library for file name support.


ok

>Because it is not needed. See http://zezula.net/en/mpq/namebreak.html>all WOW 
>internal list files are complete.


ok
>So what do you suggest? What is common in this such case?


use for debian packaging the same upstream license.
>I'm not lawyer.


well, the package is simple, with just a bunch of files, they won't loose
too much time in reviewing it :)

cheers,

G.

Reply via email to