On Tuesday 15 March 2016 22:12:18 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2016-03-15 21:26, Pali Rohár wrote: > > Aurelien, I would suggest to have libusb-dev (libusb 0.1) package in > > Debian repository, because it is stable and is working, not like new > > libusb-1.0-0-dev which is slow and unusable. > > I disagree with this statement, libusb 1.0 is used in many applications > without any problem. Contrary to libusb 0.1, it is a maintained library, > so if you encountered any bug that makes it slow, unusable or whatever, > please report a bug and a testcase, I am sure we'll find a solution.
Looks like upstream ignores this problem and so there is no other way as using working libusb 0.1 library instead that new libusb 1.0 which does not work... -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
