Hi, On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 03:15:22PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Package: devscripts > Version: 2.16.4 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > Dear Maintainer, > > some upstreams (like sks) ship their tarballs as foo-1.1.5.tgz
True and I was aware of it. > @ARCHIVE_EXT@ fails to locate this tarball. > > The attached patch should address this concern. I think it does but I think I had reason why I did not do this. It may have been something to do with signiture verification. I forgot what exactly put me off to add such extension ... You can always use explicit description in watch file if upstream uses such extension. Osamu
