On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Simon McVittie <s...@debian.org> wrote: > [added linux-user-chroot maintainer/subscribers to Cc, quoting full text > for their benefit] > > On Mon, 09 May 2016 at 09:13:42 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: >> l-u-c post: >> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/ostree-list/2016-May/msg00000.html >> >> FWIW if any transition scripts are written I'd be happy to have them in >> l-u-c upstream. >> I'm as yet unsure whether it's worth doing so, or pushing for dependent >> consumers >> to do a hard port. I'm doing the latter with my l-u-c consumers >> (gnome-continuous, my >> bashrc). >> >> Are there any l-u-c dependencies in the Debian archive? > > There don't seem to be any reverse-dependencies, so perhaps linux-user-chroot > should just disappear. I second this, there's no reverse dependencies. I plan to package bubblewrap, then ask for removal of linux-user-chroot. After that, bubblewrap can provide a transitional package - I need to see what version numbering bubblewrap will use.
Thanks for the heads-up, Laszlo/GCS