Hi! On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko <y...@debian.org> wrote: > isn't this suggesting that it has nothing to do with fail2ban start time > (which should be really fast since it just initiates a daemon in the > background) but rather that you 'network.target' an in particular > networking services takes a while to kick off?
>From what I understand with the attached SVG file the network.target is alread active and fail2ban.service takes +10s to activate. Or I am completely misunderstanding it?