On 12.05.2016 16:01, Rolf Leggewie wrote: > We usually do not close tickets without either being able to point to > a specific code change that we are absolutely certain fixes the exact > issue reported or giving the original reporter a chance to report back > if the problem persists.
After visiting the BTS on the web I see that more information had been requested as early as 2012 and the ticket had been tagged moreinfo since 2014. So, it was indeed OK to close as WFM. Benda, it would have been helpful if the closing mail had included a mentioning of the missing information that had been requested from Michal and without which there isn't anything we can do. This ticket was indeed overdue for closure. Thanks for the clean-up and testing on your AMD64 system.
