On 20/05/16 20:21, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 18.05.2016 um 16:45 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: >> Control: tags -1 confirmed >> >> On 18/05/16 15:14, Michael Biebl wrote: >>> Am 17.05.2016 um 21:41 schrieb Michael Biebl: >>>> We used deb-o-matic to compile all reverse dependencies, and only >>>> syncevolution failed to build. I was told that a fix for that is in the >>>> works. >>> >>> Small update here: syncevolution currently FTBFS because of libical >>> (#824426), once that bug is fixed the package might be binNMUable. >>> >>> Besides syncevolution the only package needing a sourceful upload is >>> evolution. I've prepared that upload in experimental and the package has >>> been built everywhere successfully. >>> So we should be good to go and this looks like a rather painless transition. > > evolution-data-server was uploaded in the mean time. > I also made sourceful uploads of evolution, evolution-ews and evolution-rss. > > Due to some unfortunate timing, evolution-rss on armel did pick up a > dependency on evolution 3.18. > > Emilio, could you please schedule a binNMU for evolution-rss on armel > with a dw on evolution-dev (>= 3.20).
Scheduled. Cheers, Emilio