control: tag -1 unreproducible moreinfo On Sun, Jun 07, 2015 at 01:55:25PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Jörg Frings-Fürst > <deb...@jff-webhosting.net> wrote: > > The output of "sudo DIST=vivid pbuilder --update && DIST=vivid pdebuild | > > tee > > ../update_build_with_PBUILDERSATISFYDEPENDSCMD.log" > > ist attached. > > there is not the --update bits.
Also, I got around actually trying it, and the gdebi resolvers just work
fine.
Do you still have problems with it?
For the error, this is the fuction that triggers it in gdebi:
def open(self, file):
try:
if (file.endswith(".deb") or
"Debian binary package" in Popen(["file", file], stdout=PIPE,
universal_newlines=True).communicate()[0]):
self._deb = DebPackage(file, self._cache)
elif (file.endswith(".dsc") or
os.path.basename(file) == "control"):
self._deb = DscSrcPackage(file, self._cache)
else:
sys.stderr.write(_("Unknown package type '%s', exiting\n") %
file)
sys.exit(1)
except (IOError,SystemError,ValueError) as e:
logging.debug("error opening: %s" % e)
sys.stderr.write(_("Failed to open the software package\n"))
sys.stderr.write(_("The package might be corrupted or you are not "
"allowed to open the file. Check the permissions "
"of the file.\n"))
sys.exit(1)
I can't really think why the .dsc wouldn't be readable (even it
remembers me of #663950).
If that was the case, now that bug is fixed, and it would be nice if you
could check with a < 0.224 version and with 0.224.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
