Source: swift-im Version: 2.0+dev6-1 Severity: serious Dear maintainer,
swift-im: * has few users https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=swift-im * has 2 unanswered RC bugs since 9 months #797279 #822131 * FTBFS * several other bugs with no action taken (and waiting for the next big upstream is no reason for that, uploads fixing stuff can be done nevertheless; also, cherry-pick is a thing and stuff fixed in the next release could be backported; and if this is too much of a delta, then you should probably release it more often) * no uploads since 2013 * hinders openssl decruft This package looks all in all in a bad shape, and I wonder whether it would be better to be without it instead. RM: swift-im -- RoQA; FTBFS; RC-buggy; FTBFS; unmaintained; low popcon -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
