On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 09:11:57PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote: > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 13:00 +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > > > * Package name : neomutt > > Please don't. We don't need another mutt fork in Debian. > > > > Did you talk to the current mutt maintainers about this? > > > > > > The changelog for the mutt 1.6.1-1 upload to experimental includes: > [ lots of patches taken from neomutt ] > > The current plan is to replace Debian's mutt-patched patchset with neomutt. > [1] > Maybe even s/mutt/neomutt/ at some point.
As mutt maintainer I second every word that Evgeni has already said, we are already working with the neomutt maintainer and there is activity, I don't believe there we are adding much with another mutt fork/additional package. Additionally I'm not sure why debian-devel@ was added to this bug. Cheers Antonio
