On 2016-06-03 02:57:01, Francois Marier wrote:
> On 2016-06-01 at 11:07:36, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> This is a followup for bug#825982.
>>
>> The scripts mentionned in that bug report don't actually work so well,
>> so I have made the following patch so that the collection script
>> actually runs properly and that it deals with corrupted data a little
>> better.
>
> It may be a couple of weeks before I get around to pushing out a new upload
> of workrave. In the meantime, would you mind trying to upstream your fixes?
>
> Upstream is very responsive and does releases regularly, so it's likely that
> I'll just be able to pull down a new upstream version with your fixes in it
> when I come back to this :)
As my blog mentions, I am trying to stay away from the computer, so I
would like to avoid that specific deliberation.
It's especially difficult because the scripts I made for the blog, which
are really the useful bits for me, are quite specific to my setup and
would need serious refactoring to have upstream meaning. And if I'm
going to do that, i'm likely to rewrite the whole thing in Python, and
if I'm going to do that, I'll be in contradiction with my desire to work
less. :)
So I do not mind the wait at all. :)
Cheers,
A.
--
Religion is like a blind man looking in a black room for a black cat
that isn't there, and finding it.
- Oscar Wilde
