On mer., 2016-06-08 at 15:05 +1000, Jeff Mills wrote: > Hi Yves, > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfwm4/+bug/1232804
This is my last attempt: pointing to a messy bug report is *not* what I meant. You keep posting this link, but it's useless for me. I'll repeat what I said in the previous bug: point me to a single patch, preferably vetted by upstream or at least tested and regression-free. Also, the problem seems to lie in two package, so I'd need clear information on the two packages. Right now I just have “it doesn't work”, and a link to another bug full of “it doesn't work” and “please try this or that”. Definitely not usable. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
