El Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:58:09 +0200 David Kalnischkies <da...@kalnischkies.de> escrigué:
> I don't know how I could look any closer at this, so you will have to > be more specific – Yes, I agree, > and you have to realize that if we find a bug in > which apt is storing a package without an epoch which has one, the > fix will be to store it with an epoch, not change all other places to > not store it with an epoch. Obviously, now I see that it's the right way to do. > > > Is there perhaps some silly "download accelerator" like apt-fast > involved? (Wich we STRONGLY advise against using!) > I have done a clean install of another system including only the basic apt-related utilities, This new system does it well, so the problem is gone. When having more time will try to isolate the problem, but for now I consider that this bug report may be closed, Thanks and sorry for the noise, Jordi Pujol i Palomer