On 26 June 2016 at 13:15, Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:20:33PM +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote: >> On 26 June 2016 at 11:24, Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using >> > OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at: >> > https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/zeroinstall-injector_2.10-2_amd64-20160530-2117 >> > >> > On https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/1.1_API_Changes you can see various >> > of the >> > reasons why it might fail. There are also updated man pages at >> > https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/ that should contain useful >> > information. >> > >> > There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a >> > recent >> > snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything >> > works. >> > >> > If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. >> >> The problem appears to be in ocaml-ssl. See: >> >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828462 > > So should it just be merged, or do you want to have 1 block the > other?
I don't mind. I guess blocks might be better, to remind me to test it when the ocaml-ssl bug is fixed. Thanks, -- talex5 (GitHub/Twitter) http://roscidus.com/blog/ GPG: DA98 25AE CAD0 8975 7CDA BD8E 0713 3F96 CA74 D8BA
