On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 09:13:25PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > >I wonder why we offer to mount /boot but not /usr (more and more >programs live there), /var (some of them might need state there) or >/tmp (don't want to create files there that will never be cleaned up).
Maybe, yes. For now I've made the code here much more generic to make it easier to ask about other filesystems, and added a check for /boot/efi too. >Also, does the question about mounting /boot really merit critical >priority? Is 'yes' not a good default? *If* the /boot fs is broken, attempting to auto-mount is probably not a good plan. This is about the only sensible way to allow people to control that, I guess. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com Support the Campaign for Audiovisual Free Expression: http://www.eff.org/cafe/