On 7 July 2016 at 19:12, Thibaut Varène <vare...@debian.org> wrote: > >> On 08 Jul 2016, at 01:01, Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Thibaut, >> >> On 7 July 2016 at 18:41, Thibaut Varène <vare...@debian.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On 03 Jul 2016, at 22:06, z...@debian.org wrote: >>>> >>>> Control: tags 796612 + patch >>>> Control: tags 796612 + pending >>>> >>>> Dear maintainer, >>>> >>>> I've prepared an NMU for flashybrid (versioned as 0.18+nmu2) and >>>> uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I >>>> should delay it longer. >>> >>> It’s ok, you do what you have to do. >>> If you want to take over maintainership, please be my guest. I’m >>> maintaining “upstream” here now: >>> >>> http://hacks.slashdirt.org/sw/flashybrid/ >>> >>> I’d welcome a patch to merge btw. >> >> Your upstream page claims that 0.19 supports systemd. > > It “supports” it to the extent that it fixes #784890 and boots correctly on > Jessie (as far as my very basic tests showed). It does not have the glue that > the NMU supposedly fixes. Glue I’d be happy to merge were I sent a patch.
Christian, you didn't attach the first nmu diff apparently, could you please re send it? > >> Why not upload >> that version to debian? > > Because my upload rights have been revoked with the 1024-bit keys purge, and > at this point I don’t care anymore. I'd be happy to sponsor the upload. But if you are no longer maintaining the package in debian maybe it should be RMed instead. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler
