Hello Chris,

On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 21:12:09 +0200
Chris Lamb <la...@debian.org> wrote:

> Source: minidlna
> Version: 1.1.5+dfsg-3
> Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed
> that minidlna could not be built reproducibly.
> 
> Patch attached.
> 
>  [0] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds

+-      [with_osver="$withval"],[with_osver="$(uname -r)"])
++      [with_osver="$withval"],[with_osver="Debian GNU/Linux"])

According to 
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/minidlna.html
it has now problem with reproducible builds, isn't it?

We have the following line in debian/rules:
override_dh_auto_configure:
        dh_auto_configure -- --with-os-version=$(shell cut -d" " -f1 
/etc/issue.net)

And I believe that parsing /etc/issue.net or lsb_release is a little
bit better, because packages from Ubuntu or any other derivatives should
not have "Debian" inside it's version (or description).

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander Gerasiov

 Contacts:
 e-mail: g...@cs.msu.su  Homepage: http://gerasiov.net  Skype: gerasiov
 PGP fingerprint: 04B5 9D90 DF7C C2AB CD49  BAEA CA87 E9E8 2AAC 33F1

Reply via email to