On 31 July 2016 at 20:20, Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) <timothy.pot...@hpe.com> wrote: > Patch attached to fix this, but it's a bit icky (and has been replaced by a > shell out to call > getent in a later version.
Very nice catch indeed! Given that the code in question is rewritten in newer commits, do you think it'd be worthwhile to instead just bump our snapshot? (since the newer code no longer relies on $USER) ♥, - Tianon 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4
