Package: util-linux Version: 2.28-6 Severity: normal Hi,
ATM, on debian, login, su, ... are provided by the shadow package. It seems that all other distribution are using the implementations from util-linux. Shouldn't debian do the same and shouldn't we build the "login" from util-linux? This should of course be coordinated with the maintainer of the shadow package. Regards, Laurent Bigonville -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages util-linux depends on: ii libblkid1 2.28-6 ii libc6 2.23-4 ii libfdisk1 2.28-6 ii libmount1 2.28-6 ii libncursesw5 6.0+20160625-1 ii libpam0g 1.1.8-3.3 ii libselinux1 2.5-3 ii libsmartcols1 2.28-6 ii libsystemd0 231-1 ii libtinfo5 6.0+20160625-1 ii libudev1 231-1 ii libuuid1 2.28-6 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1 util-linux recommends no packages. Versions of packages util-linux suggests: ii dosfstools 4.0-2 ii kbd 2.0.3-2 ii util-linux-locales 2.28-6 -- no debconf information