replying again for inclusion of the 833...@bugs.debian.org cc 2016-08-09 19:24 GMT+02:00 Folkert Muller <folkertmul...@gmail.com>:
> The permissions were 644 in the case I found, and 755 when I tested it > myself. > In the first case I only have seen the result on the server, in the second > case the rights on the client and server where the same. When I created a > new file (with thunar on a folder mounted on this server) the permissions > were 664 as expected. > > I expected the "force create mode = 0664" its brother "create mask = 0664" > to overrule permissions when copying to the server. > > Maybe I just didn't understand "unix extensions" would overwrite the above > options. > > I use 664 on one big share, and have the base folder set so nobody can > edit it, the rights on the next folders are drwxrxs--- or drwxrwsr-x with > the groups corresponding to who may edit. > > Cheers to you as well, it's 19:13 here in the netherlands and I am > drinking the australian chardonnay "willowglen". I hope you are enjoying > yourself as well. > > Greetings, Folkert > > 2016-08-09 18:57 GMT+02:00 Jelmer Vernooij <jel...@debian.org>: > >> severity 833869 wishlist >> thanks >> >> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 06:46:48PM +0200, folkert wrote: >> > I found out a user put a file on the server and another user from the >> same group >> > not beeing able to edit it. Both users using a debian stable client. >> What were the permissions/owner/group of the file after being copied by >> the >> first user? >> >> This sounds like regular unix behaviour. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Jelmer >> > >
