in-line :- On 11/08/2016, Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi shirish,
Hi Axel, <snipped> > So unless you want to change aptitude's default, I don't see any bug > here and would like to close this bug report again. Could you tell/share/remind why does aptitude do it differently than apt-cache or axi-cache . I do find using apt-cache or axi-cache search to be better in this aspect rather than plain aptitude :( I have always been telling friends that aptitude is better than other package managers, more powerful and yet pretty convenient. Is there some reason that we do not use the description wildcard when searching for packages. ? And I know this will be a big change and probably not welcomed by most/many sys-admins so not saying that. If I were to change the behavior in my aptitude installation, where or how I could do the change so the above behavior that you shared could be simulated. I forgot to share that I had seen both man apt.conf and the examples given at /usr/share/doc/examples and specifically the configure-index.gz but didn't become any wiser. I would like to make changes and keep it at /etc/apt/apt.conf so when the searches happen, it happens both for name as well as description . Even doing it ~/.aptitude is ok but didn't see any possibilities in either the aptitude or apt-conf man page. Look forward to knowing more. > Regards, Axel > -- > ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ > : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin > `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 > `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE > -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A 2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8