Disclaimer: I am not a maintainer of this package.
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 09:21:15PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 09:57:14PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > For the "cannot build twice in a row" issue please file yet another > > (non-RC) bug. > > I think you misunderstood my reference to reproducible builds completely. > > When I said "fails on reproducible builds" I did not mean that the two > builds made by reproducible builds differ, but instead that one of the > builds failed, i.e. that the package FTBFS, which of course it is RC. > > While we are at it, reproducible builds has nothing to do with > "building twice in a row". > > Building twice in a row means "dpkg-buildpackage; dpkg-buildpackage" fails, > normally because of bugs in the clean target, but this is not what > reproducible builds people do. What misled me was that the first build was successful and only the second build failed. The failure in the second build is: === RUN TestInotifyStress --- FAIL: TestInotifyStress (5.00s) inotify_test.go:236: Creates and removes should not be off by more than one: 1502 creates, 1509 removes Is the second build constantly failing due to some difference in the build environments (e.g. TestInotifyStress dislikes French), or is this a testcase that sometimes fails randomly? This seems clearly different from both #819452 and your "dpkg-buildpackage -A" issue. I agree with you that this is RC no matter whether it depends on the environment or happens randomly. > Thanks. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed