On 29 août 2016 15:24, Florian Höch <f...@hoech.net> wrote:

> Am 29.08.2016 um 14:56 schrieb Christian Marillat:
>> You are really sure ?
>
> All the patch seems to do in essence is use a different static timestamp
> value, which for all intents and purposes is fine, it just looks redundant.

OK, I've removed this patch. No new upload, I'm waiting for the next
upstream release.

Christian

Reply via email to