On 29 août 2016 15:24, Florian Höch <f...@hoech.net> wrote: > Am 29.08.2016 um 14:56 schrieb Christian Marillat: >> You are really sure ? > > All the patch seems to do in essence is use a different static timestamp > value, which for all intents and purposes is fine, it just looks redundant.
OK, I've removed this patch. No new upload, I'm waiting for the next upstream release. Christian