On 27/08/16 04:39, James McCoy wrote: > On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 10:10:29AM -0400, James McCoy wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 06:17:31PM -0400, James McCoy wrote: >>> + libdata-messagepack-perl has a fix upstream but no "stable" release >>> including it > > There is now an actual upstream release with the msgpack-c changes. > >>> + libdata-messagepack-stream-perl could be NMUed once >>> libdata-messagepack-perl is available. >> >> No activity on either of these. >> >> They're only used by libcatmandu-store-lucy-perl and >> libtext-xslate-perl, which have no rdeps. Should I bump the severity of >> these bugs or suggest removing them? > > I've pinged these bugs and got responses that the Perl folks would be ok > with those two packages being removed from testing (not unstable since > packaging was done in response to an RFP) to help the transition and > possibly bring visibility to the needed maintenance. > > Given that there's been some activity upstream around these packages, > I'm a little more confident about performing NMUs than I had been. > > Thoughts on how to proceed?
Upload msgpack-c to unstable, then you bump the remaining bugs to RC. Cheers, Emilio
