On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 02:40:49 +0200 Martin Quinson wrote: [...] > I had a quick lookup at your work, and it looks very promising to me.
I'm glad to read this, thanks for your fast feedback. > > A first point would be to convert your tests to a proper test of our > infrastructure, somewhere under t/ Once you have some automated tests, > I will happily integrate your work in the main archive. This is where I need your help most: could you please do the conversion yourself? I am convinced that this would be the best option, since I have zero familiarity with the test infrastructure used in po4a and I am afraid I would mess everything up... :-p > > Then, the next step will be to test your work against the existing > Ruby documentation, and fix it until it works properly. I'll try and find a little more time and test Rd.pm against some existing Ruby documentation. > I saw the > documented limitations, but I'm not sure of how bad they are, > considering the existing Ruby documentation. I think we can live with the limitations, for the time being. Anyway, one of the limitations could soon be dropped, since a friend has just sent me a promising patch... [...] > In any case, many thanks for this contribution, that's good work. I am glad you liked it. Thanks for your time and for your commitment to help me during the integration of Rd.pm into the official po4a package! -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpmaLQScUZbb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
