Hi, On 15/09/16 at 19:39 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > Hello. > > This package is still a headache for my autobuilder. > > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > Indeed it was the equivalent of dpkg-buildpackage -A that > > triggered it. > > Do you mean you could always reproduce with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" > and never with "dpkg-buildpackage"? > > Later you said: > > > [ sysctl tunings ] > > It seems that one of those caused that failure, because, now that I have > > them disabled, it does not fail anymore. > > Are you sure that removing those settings is the real reason it stopped > failing for you? (Would you try a few more times?) > > It still fails for me, randomly, and I'm not using EC2 but KVM on my > own server and KVM on a commercial provider, so my alternate theory is > that it was random before you dropped the settings, and it continues > to be random after dropping the settings. > > This is my historic data: > > Status: failed google-perftools_2.2.1-0.2_amd64-20151025T1748Z > Status: failed google-perftools_2.2.1-0.2_amd64-20151201T1848Z > Status: failed google-perftools_2.2.1-0.2_amd64-20151220T1430Z > Status: failed google-perftools_2.2.1-0.2_amd64-20160101T2221Z > Status: failed google-perftools_2.2.1-0.2_amd64-20160507T1523Z > Status: failed google-perftools_2.2.1-0.2_amd64-20160507T1649Z > Status: failed google-perftools_2.2.1-0.3_amd64-20160914T055103Z > Status: failed google-perftools_2.2.1-0.3_amd64-20160914T150752Z > Status: failed google-perftools_2.2.1-0.3_amd64-20160914T151026Z > Status: failed google-perftools_2.2.1-0.3_amd64-20160914T151114Z > Status: failed google-perftools_2.2.1-0.3_amd64-20160914T161241Z > Status: failed google-perftools_2.2.1-0.3_amd64-20160914T151357Z > Status: successful google-perftools_2.2.1-0.3_amd64-20160914T161322Z > Status: successful google-perftools_2.2.1-0.3_amd64-20160914T161612Z > Status: successful google-perftools_2.2.1-0.3_amd64-20160914T161656Z > Status: failed google-perftools_2.2.1-0.3_amd64-20160914T161654Z > Status: failed google-perftools_2.2.1-0.3_amd64-20160914T161043Z > > > Version 2.2.1-0.3 is the first one that does not *always* fail for me. > This is a great achievement indeed. > > Now it builds sometimes, but 3/11 is not a very good ratio.
I'm not sure, no. It's indeed possible that it's still failing randomly. Lucas
