Le mercredi, 5 octobre 2016, 20.08:31 h CEST Chris Lamb a écrit : > Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > But all-in-all, what matters is the dependency, as there were no changes > > since 2013 (4.1+Debian10), and Jessie has 4.1+Debian13. > > Just to be clear, are you suggesting that the version part should be > dropped?
It's a political question. My nitpicker side favours precise dependencies (because we can), but my realistic side admits lsb-base >= 4.1+Debian13 will be available for all packages which will see changes following the lintian warning. If we can, and we can, we should have precise dependencies instead of 'available in stable'; it helps downstreams as well. > I've seen other bits of Deban be really rather "picky" about versions (even > ones that are satisfied in oldstable!) so I took my lead from that. > > What do others think? > > (ACK on the status_of_proc — will fix.) Great, thanks. -- Cheers, OdyX