-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:53:48 +0200 Rene Engelhard <r...@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 03:10:47PM +0200, Andreas Glaeser wrote: > > If I am getting things correctly, the backported version is identical with > > the one in > > Stretch/testing, so the same bug would be there, it migrated there in fact > > from > > unstable > > In this case, yes.. > > Other bugs can be only appearing on backports. > This one does not, I have just checked that, in a KVM-VM, see there: 840...@bugs.debian.org > And no, it is not identical. If it was there was no need for a backport. It's > a rebuild > (with changed dependencies and any adaptions needed) to work in stable. > (And it's from testing, not unstable.) > > > and if nobody complains or otherwise nobody feels responsible to react to > > the report, > > it will inevitably migrate to stable. > > Yes, the testing version. Not *-backports. And that only on the next release. > -backports is not a staging ground for updates in "real" stable. It's > separate. > Ah-ha ! > > > > there appeared a new version of the LibreOffice suite from Backports > > > > today. > > > > LibreOffice-Draw fails to compress multipage-PDFs, it just makes a copy > > > > of the > > > > original document, regardless of the quality- and other settings. > > > > I use this function quite frequently, so I can tell, the problem > > > > appeared > > > > _today_. > > > > > > So between 5.1.5 and 5.2.2. Very helpful. Another reason why bug reporting > > > should be done on sid, so one knows what happens when, not only when the > > > thing is (supposedly) stable enough to get into backports. > > > > > Sorry, I am not using unstable, I never have in fact, I think the version > > in testing > > is usually new enough, except, there is currently a freeze-phase on the > > testing-branch. > > No, there isn't a freeze yet in testing. That only starts in some time. If > there was, > 5.2.2 would not have migrated there in the first place and thus there > wouldn't be a > backport of 5.2.2 anyways. > Yeah, anyway, the problem exists in Stretch, it has nothing to do with stable-dependencies vs. testing-dependencies: > user@stretchtst:~$ aptitude show libreoffice > Package: libreoffice > Version: 1:5.2.2~rc2-2 > > > Anyway: When looking in LOs Bugzilla I see > > > https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101563 > > > (do you use linked images?) > > > and > > > https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99303 > > > (which isn't very useful.) > > > > > > based on theupstream reports I set the version accordingly to a existing > > > version. (And tag it moreinfo.) > > > > > Was this enough info or not?? > > No, since you didn't answer any question here. E.g. the question in the cited > part above. > Now this should really satisfy your needs for INFO, I will tag the report 'UPSTREAM' now. Greetings A. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlgBBRsACgkQ5+rBHyUt5wvunwCgoGKudo1ivSmMpmxsQ32ZOioS VikAn0gWyvUVfWz6SffV9pRj5TMtFMnv =g6xY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----