Hi Neil, sorry for the late reply... Been busy recenently.
Am Sonntag, den 25.09.2016, 12:32 -0400 schrieb Neil Roeth: > Hi, Tobi, > > The removal of jade, sp and openjade1.3 is coming > along. Openjade1.3 > is done, it was actually removed from testing but there were no more > dependencies on it. I was focusing recently on the sp binary > package, > and most of those dependencies have been switched to opensp. Jade is > next. > > There are tracking bugs already, 811310 and 811312. ok > Aboot and iputils have bugs with patches open to change sp to opensp. > > Can you explain the output below? I guess "dak rm jade" means remove > jade, while the -n means not to actually do it (no act). What does > -R > mean? Does the command apply to the jade source package or the > binary > package? I'm guessing source since sp appears in the list and it is > a > binary package built from the jade source package. The command checks what would happen if you remove jade from the archives, a convenient way to check reverse dependencies you have on jade. > Thanks. > > On 09/25/2016 07:04 AM, Tobias Frost wrote: > > Hi Neil, > > > > how is the removal going? > > I was wondering if there should be a dedicated bug to track the > > status > > of the progess? What do you think? > > > > > > A "dak rm -Rn jade" yields to: > > > > > > # Broken Depends: > > xmldiff: xmldiff-xmlrev > > > > # Broken Build-Depends: > > aboot: sp > > alex: jade > > datapacker: jade > > dejagnu: jade > > gnome-packagekit: sp > > gstreamer1.0: jade (>= 1.2.1) > > iputils: sp > > kannel: jade > > libetpan: jade > > lprng-doc: jade > > mozart: sp > > pyepl: jade > > scons-doc: jade > > > > > > -- > > tobi > > > > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 21:00:50 -0400 Neil Roeth <n...@debian.org> > > wrote: > > > I intend to remove this package from Debian rather than update > > > > it. The > > > Debian packages openjade/opensp can be used instead. I will file > > > bugs > > > against any packages that depend on jade and give them some time > > > to > > > > be > > > updated before I file the actual removal bug for jade. > > > > > > -- > > > Neil Roeth > > > > > > > > > > > > >
