Hi Boyuan, On So, 2016-10-23 at 15:53 +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: (...) > Several months have passed since last update. Still I think this is > something (...) > Just as the log says in the previous email (20160731), we would meet > > Package 'cutegram_2.9.5-1aseman-xenial+git20161022.0.2373dd32-1' > REJECTED: Malformed distribution 'unstable': Must be > '<codename>-<repoid>-<suite>[-rollback<n>]' > 2016-10-23 13:33:24,139 mini_buildd.views (0078): > INFO : > API call 'logcat' by user 'admin' [views:206]
my apologies, I did not have time to look at this at all until now ;). > FYI, this mini-buildd instance is set on "https://b.hosiet.me";. Ah nice ;). > I grep-ed through your source code and found the class called > mini_buildd.misc.Distribution is causing problems. Appearantly it is (...) > So why would things bother like this? Well, I still want to upload a > package (...) > now because such packages would be REJECTED due to the > Malformed-Distribution problem as I stated above. > > It would be great if we could finish that goal before Stretch freeze. Yes. I am actually currently trying to bring any bug/wishlist fixes or roadmap features "anyhow feasable for 1.0.x" in before switching to 1.2.x development (which somehow coincidences with the stretch release). No promises ;), but I think I will look into that for 1.0.25. > If there > is anything wrong, please point it out for me :) No, I don't think so. From your description I would think that this is just a bug in mini-buildd that has crept in at some time for that special configuration -- given that I don't use that anywhere myself in production instances, nor in my "big wheel testing" ;(. Hth! S
