Alexander Kurtz [2016-10-30 22:05 +0100]: > Thanks a lot for your quick reply! You might want to consider also > adding "armhf" to that list, since both gnu-efi [0] and u-boot-rpi [1] > are also available there (in contrast to "armel" where gnu-efi is > missing).
I know that arm64 EFI boot works (Canonical uses it in their internal OpenStack deployment), but as far as I know there is no existing armhf EFI implementation; so this would mean to ship dead bits. Or are you aware of any platform where this could actually be tested? Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature