On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 03:59:09PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 06:40:32PM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
> 
> > søn, 30.05.2004 kl. 13.37 skrev Guus Sliepen:
> > > I am planning to upload libgmime2 with just the Maintainer: field
> > > changed, and a new libgmime2.1 package. However, there are also packages
> > > in unstable for libgmime0 and libgmime1. As far as apt-cache rdepends
> > > can tell me, there are no Debian packages depending on them, so I'm
> > > inclined to send an email to ftp-master to have them removed. However,
> > > if you know that there still are people using those Debian packages,
> > > I'll continue maintaining them.
> > 
> > I have no idea. Like you, anyone using this library is apparently doing
> > it for their own projects, not for Debian. But if you want my opinion,
> > you can almost certainly remove libgmime0. However, I wouldn't want to
> > remove libgmime1 yet - at least not before sarge is released (with it),
> > in any case, and maybe not even before people start thinking about
> > removing libglib1.2 itself from Debian. It's difficult to be sure
> > without user feedback, for sure. Maybe not even http//popcon.debian.org/
> > (seems to down at the moment) would help much here...
> 
> ftp-master: please remove libgmime0 and libgmime0-dev from unstable.

Hrmz, is there any good reason to really have this many (4 until I just
removed gmime0) versions of the same library in Debian? Only if it's very
difficult to migrate to a next version, and there are a lot of reverse
dependencies, it's IMHO sensible to have multiple versions. Otherwise, I
stronly suggest to make the source package name 'gmime', and not change
that while uploading new versions of the package, but instead filing bugs
on reverse-depends to migrate. There are only 3 packages using a version of
gmime, incidently, all are using the latest version already.

--Jeroen

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to