Quoting James Clarke (2016-11-10 09:12:50) > > In pbuilder's case the date of a binNMU is just `date -R` when the command > > runs, thus we don't have the same problem as described there. > > > > I'm following that discussion to see what it'll lead to, but I'm > > unconvinced that we need to mangle the date like you suggest. Especially > > your last email that talks about m-a:same potential troubles leaves me > > unbought, as ma:same is afaik only avout file contents, surely not file > > metadata (timestamps) (which would be different anyway for the "last > > timestamp+1sec" as you said?!). > > Well if SDE varies, binaries, manpages etc can end up having different > contents...
and then packages with the same binNMU number will not be co-installable anymore if they share a file that ends up having different content because of S_D_E. cheers, josch
signature.asc
Description: signature
