Hi Jörg,

Yes, DEP9 is marked obsolete. I somehow missed that. But still: do
we need to depend on "update-inetd"?

Regards,
 - Darsha

On 2016-11-01 08:26, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> Hello Darahaka,
> 
> thank you for spending your time helping to make Debian better with
> this bug report.
> 
> From [1]:
> 
> As of Feb 2014: With a dynamic init system in Debian finally being
> adopted, inetd is irrelevant, hence reconf-inetd too, so I mark this
> DEP as obsolete, since it's not worth the migration effort.
> 
> 
> So I close this bug.
> 
> CU
> Jörg
> 
> [1] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep9/
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to