On Dec/03, Bob Proulx wrote: > By my count there are 23 "<<" dependencies in use with mitmproxy! > Wow! That is a lot of very fragile and breakage prone packages. It > is doomed to have repeated breakages in Sid and Testing as those > modules get uploaded. It isn't a good way to do things. Basically > there are 23 timebomb snags in this package that can go off at any > time due to any of those being upgraded. That is bad. > > Why so many timebombs in this package?
Because that's how setup.py is written upstream ? If you have time to contribute patches fixing some of those (by testing they are unnecessary, for instance), please do so, and I'll happily include them right away. Cheers, --Seb
