+ Sometimes two or more packgages need to be able to modify the + same configuration file. One such case is were related packages + share a configuration file (e.g. bash and other bourn compatible + shells share /etc/profile).
You are implicitly saying that there are packages that "need" to modify /etc/profile. The way I read policy 9.9, packages should not need to modify /etc/profile to be useful. Therefore I object to this proposal in its current form. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
