On 2016-12-08 22:03 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > > Raising severity; this should be a release blocker. > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 18:42:24 +0000 Wookey <woo...@wookware.org> wrote: > > Source: luajit > > Version: 2.1.0~beta2+dfsg-1 > > Severity: important > > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > Yay - luajit with arm64 support uploaded! > > > > However, whilst it builds, it doesn't appear to work at all. > [...] > > Does this bug exist in the version in testing/unstable (2.0.4+dfsg-1)? > Currently the BTS records it as affecting experimental only.
well, version 2.0.4+dfsg-1 does not have any arm64 support and thus is not built for arm64. So no, it doesn't have the bug that you can build it for arm64 but it doesn't work. But on the other hand it does have 'doesn't work on arm64' So I'm really not sure whether one should mark this bug as applying to 2.0.4. Can we get laujit 2.1-with-arm64-support into unstable for stretch? There are serious people that would really like to see that (because important stuff like nginx need luajit), but presumably the transition freeze applies here? Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
