Sorry, I forgot about this, I'll look for old mails with text/rfc822-headers
attachments.

If I fail to find something, I'll try to construct one.

On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 04:50:57AM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> Hi, any updates on this? Thanks.
> 
> * Adeodato Sim?? [Thu, 24 Nov 2005 01:55:40 +0100]:
> 
> > * Ambrose Li [Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:20:24 -0500]:
> 
> > Hi,
> 
> > > If I try to forward an attachment of type text/rfc822-headers, mutt
> > > will forward it in-line and with lots of headers deleted. This happens
> > > even if I explicitly "set mime_forward".
> 
> > > It is thus currently impossible to forward "full headers" for spam
> > > reporting if the only headers available are inside a
> > > text/rfc822-headers attachment.
> 
> >   There are several more forwarding-related options; could I have a
> >   sample mbox to test?
> 
> >   If not, what are the value of your $mime_forward_decode and
> >   $mime_forward_rest variables? Also, if you set $mime_forward to no,
> >   does unsetting $forward_decode help?
> 
> > > (Workaround is to save the attachment to a file, then insert the file
> > > from the text editor. Therefore the bug is "normal" and not
> > > "important".)
> 
> >   As a last resort, I believe you could also unset $weed.
> 
> >   I wait your feedback on this bug report,
> 
> 
> -- 
> Adeodato Sim??                                     dato at net.com.org.es
> Debian Developer                                  adeodato at debian.org
>  
> Everything you read in newspapers is absolutely true, except for that
> rare story of which you happen to have first-hand knowledge.
>                 -- Erwin Knoll
> 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to