On Saturday, December 31, 2016 10:06:37 PM CST you wrote: > your package includes some files that seem to lack sources > in preferred forms of modification (even if removed during clean target).
No part of the resulting binary package comes from files that are not in their intended form of modification. I acknowledge there are extra non-source files in the source tarball *that are not used* to create the binary. > According to Debian Free Software Guidelines [1] (DFSG) #2: > "The program must include source code, and must allow distribution > in source code as well as compiled form." Digikam meets this test. > In some cases this could also constitute a license violation for some > copyleft licenses such as the GNU GPL. (While sometimes the licence > allows not to ship the source, the DFSG always mandates source code.) It requires all sources required to create the binary. Digikam meets this test. -Steve
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
