-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Am So den 1. Jan 2017 um 20:24 schrieb Jason Pyeron: > Yes, 8-bit ASCII, here is a translation table.
ASCII is 7 bit. All 8 bit are different encodings. > > Below 128 it is not a problem as UTF-8 is transparent in this > > range. But > > above 128 it _is_ a problem. > > No, only when not ENCODED properly. Well, exactly what I said. > UTF-8 is very, very, likely going to stay. I would wish that it would die as it is bad designed and have some bad behaviour, technical wise. However, I am realistic enough to know that it will not be possible to replace UTF-8 with better design's. It is like IPv6, there is no Plan B. Just I will only use UTF-8 where it is cleary specified (like XML) or where it is the only possible way to go. With everything else I stay with latin1. But this is just my personal view. Regards Klaus - -- Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.ch/ pub 4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16 Klaus Ethgen <kl...@ethgen.ch> Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753 62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Charset: ISO-8859-1 iQGzBAEBCgAdFiEEMWF28vh4/UMJJLQEpnwKsYAZ9qwFAlhpW38ACgkQpnwKsYAZ 9qzrIgwAlGkTGVpJEp1XKYNcpUF2hR7Ie6vlA3xFBfCacCDAjJx5gIrGLkX5d8Ay rus3hblp/Gv+r+IpzUrRyk5gifBAfaDWVnuj1j8Qi9dLFyhnQaD0LX8/MBgV6wOn A2/C+XedX1geoZxk7c/m6b59XaWAuN36JK8PJjpoWX/8MNqDoNYAr31gMrZkHwmw IYZygbLom22qcSq4ZeowWY5ZUX9nqku0/9NNzBYtegB/YIWxbzxWNaOIPhgPouZ5 Ejjd14NBap4ZT263Bc55L+tvCBX2BU1iFipmKa5pRslexF3UdscR1e20b0wWVTaP HTkcNJggsNQVUpPYyxp6xUWkmaItZCMSSHC77sv4ur6jnRY8IolUlh+x68ZEayIn yU5O/rjg3tMbNaZHTOZcNZNtOisNOMm19SOkwNCezKdods8BhAI0z9I7rnDaOumT HefdprK0CTuylGKdAvBxJv6io3AKkNdTaZ32bFnfE2HtaX77ZNDTgXkmutE1og6t UeF6fw/T =Mr6M -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
