Hello, On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 07:22:08PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > Then we need to go through the code in dgit and ensure that the suite > name is appropriate qualified everywhere. Probably, $csuite needs to > be abolished and turned into two variables, one containing the distro > name and one being just the bare suite. > > There should be separate a config option (separate to > dgit.default.distro) to specify which distro(s) distro-unqualified > branch names refer to. This config option mustn't change often, > because changing it can change the implied upstream source of a branch > name.
I take it that Debian's dgit repos won't see any change? I.e. remain unqualified? > [1] Sane possibilities for the branch name would appear to include > (opinions welcome): > > My favourites: > > Format (local branch) Example > > dgit/DISTRO=SUITE raspbian=jessie > dgit/DISTRO#SUITE raspbian#jessie > dgit/SUITE@DISTRO jessie@raspbian > > Other possibilities: > > dgit/DISTRO%SUITE raspbian%jessie > dgit/SUITE%DISTRO jessie%raspbian '=' could be misleading. Otherwise I like the '@' as it has a semantic reading which makes it easy to memorise. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
