Sebastian Andrzej Siewior: > On 2017-01-24 06:34:00 [+0000], Niels Thykier wrote: >> The guard, you proposed, is using 1.0.2, so this patch will be >> unnecessary (guess I misunderstood your original intention). But the >> end result should be the same. :) > > [...] > The point is to ensure that nobody tries to use that header file and > link against net-snmp whith an incompatible libssl. >
Indeed. I have decided to go with 1.0.2 to minimize the changes. :) > [...] > > I am not sure what we should about the package that will now fail to > build due to missing libssl-dev. Two of them (as it looks) could be > fixed if we tell libesmtp not to export the ssl flags. > > Sebastian > * collected upstream *explicitly* adds a -lssl -lcrypto in an Makefile.am, so the package should B-D on it as necessary (or patch those -l statements out if they are unnecessary). * cacti-spine => Paul said he would fix that, so I assuming he got this * hplip => source suggests that there should be some from of build-dependency[1] * pacemaker => Ideally, libesmtp-dev would either depend on libssl-dev (or not include -lcrypto -lssl in its libesmtp-config script) I will file bugs for the above (cacti-spine being a possible exception) tomorrow - feel free to beat me to it. :) Thanks, ~Niels [1] https://sources.debian.net/src/hplip/3.16.11%2Brepack0-1/installer/core_install.py/?hl=370#L370
